Q:
Ashley,
It was suggested we contact you about home water drinking system options. We have used a NSA filtration system for years and it has to be replaced. We are just starting to look at water systems options. There are only two of us and we don't go through that much water.
We're wondering if perhaps reverse osmosis unnecessarily removes too many minerals and uses too much water in the process. Mountain Fresh (a Calgary company) has filtration systems that seem OK, but we don't understand the science behind water, nor how our choices may affect the environment. It was mentioned today that disposing of filters is an environmental consideration. Also, a friend mentioned the issue of pharmaceuticals in water. Is this a concern for Calgary? Fluoride? Other bacteria? Cysts?
Can you give us some advice about wise ways to provide good drinking water in our home in Calgary and/or contacts where we could learn more?
Regards,
Shelly
A:
Hello Shelly,
There are a tonne of resources out there and unfortunately the answers aren't always clear. Chlorine removal is a good place to start and we've know for a long time that chlorine is not great for our health. It should be noted that chlorination is a cost effective way to remove such waterborne diseases as cholera, typhoid and dysentery, making it the overwhelming choice for municipal water treatment. Luckily, chlorine is effectively removed by carbon and multimedia filters such as your NSA filter or the one sold by Mountain Fresh. Chlorine is not, however, removed by reverse osmosis.
Reverse osmosis uses a semi-permeable membrane that removes larger molecular structures like salt but those things like pesticides and chlorine that are molecularly smaller than water are free to pass through the membrane. They are great at removing salt, fluoride and other minerals, as well as pathogens. That said it also removes things like iron and manganese, both of which are essential to natural body processes. It should be noted that reverse osmosis systems use more water and energy than the simpler filtration systems. I have read that the reverse osmosis systems can use 2-3 litres of water for every one they purify.
Carbon or multimedia filters are able to rid water of larger compound materials, like salt, while removing much of the smaller dangerous chemicals like chlorine and pesticides. These systems also leave trace minerals that are beneficial to our health. They also tend to be the most efficient and cost effective systems for creating healthy drinking water. From what I could find they do not remove all of the fluoride from the water but it seems that in addition to its base system, Mountain Fresh does offers a filter that will address the fluoride issue.
And yes, fluoride is a reality in Calgary. Not only do we have natural (background) levels of fluoride in our water from our surrounding geology, but the City of Calgary adds Fluorosilicic Acid to boost the concentration from the natural level of 0.1 - 0.4 mg/L (ppm) to 0.7 mg/L. There is still a lot of debate around the addition of fluoride to drinking water but when the question of the city adding fluoride to our water went to a plebiscite in 1998, the public voted 55% in favor of supplemental fluoride. I guess it is a decision we must live with for the time being.
In terms of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs), the jury is still out. This field of study is still in its infancy but we can feel some relief from the fact that we do not live downstream of a major centre and the water we do receive is of relatively high quality. We should be more concerned for the people living downstream of Calgary though. A recent pilot study (http://ec.europa.eu/research/infocentre/export/success/article_705_en.html) in Germany found that ozonation was rather effective in reducing PPCPs. This does bring some hope in addressing this very important issue and I hope that we hear more about it in the near future.
Finally, in terms of filter disposal I would talk to your supplier of filters to see how they deal with them. It seems that these filters would concentrate toxins, minerals, chlorine, etc and that they should be carefully disposed of. Given the long life of the filters I would assume that this would have a lesser environmental impact than say a Brita filter which is to be replaced every 3 or so months. I contacted Mountain Fresh and they said that the filters are landfilled at the end of their life, as they cannot be cleaned and reused.
I hope this clears a few things up. Looking at the larger picture it would seem that a carbon or multimedia filter would be the most effective and efficient water purification systems out there. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. If you want more information I found that http://www.historyofwaterfilters.com/ was a pretty good resource.
Purely,
Ashley
Ashley Lubyk, BSC in Environmental Science, is a Calgary Materials Exchange Program Assistant at Clean Calgary Association.
Please send your question concerning Water, Waste, or Recycling to Ashley Lubyk